With innovative tech and bold tokenomics, it’s a high-risk, high-reward move that could redefine blockchain strategies.
The crypto space thrives on bold moves. In a world where innovation meets constant disruption, blockchain projects are continually seeking ways to adapt, grow, and deliver value to their communities. Layer One X (L1X) is the latest to shake things up with its decision to delist from centralized exchanges (CEXs) and relist exclusively on decentralized exchanges (DEXs) starting January 2025. The project aims to relist its $L1X token at $0.15 on DEXs such as Uniswap, PancakeSwap, and Raydium. It’s a strategy that aligns with blockchain’s decentralized ethos — but is it a groundbreaking strategy or a risky gamble?
In this article, I explore the rationale behind L1X’s decision, how its innovative technology plays into this strategy, and whether Layer One X’s ambitious plans stand a chance.
What’s Behind the Delisting and Relisting Strategy?
At its core, delisting from CEXs and pivoting to DEXs is a gamble on decentralization. Centralized exchanges offer liquidity and exposure but often come with drawbacks like high fees, custodial risks, and the threat of regulatory crackdowns. DEXs, by contrast, offer greater user autonomy, privacy, and alignment with the decentralized ideals of blockchain technology.
For Layer One X, this strategy isn’t just a philosophical move — it’s a practical one. The token’s performance on CEXs has been underwhelming, with prices falling and liquidity dwindling. By transitioning to DEXs, L1X aims to stabilize its token price, attract more engaged community members, and better manage liquidity.
L1X’s Unique Tech: Building a Sustainable Ecosystem
Layer One X’s move isn’t just about where its token trades — it’s about how it’s traded. The project is banking on a comprehensive fee structure, tokenomics, and cross-chain capabilities to set itself apart. Here’s how it works:
Fee-Driven Burn Mechanism: Every transaction within the L1X ecosystem contributes to the token’s value. Fees are allocated to reward NFT holders, liquidity provision, and buy and burn L1X tokens, reducing supply and and driving long-term price appreciation.Innovative Liquidity Pools: To address liquidity concerns common on DEXs, L1X has allocated $50,000 in liquidity for each trading pair on platforms like Uniswap, PancakeSwap, and Raydium. These pools will ensure smoother trading on DEXs.Stakeholder Incentives: To promote liquidity and network stability, L1X rewards liquidity providers with staking incentives. These rewards are intended to incentivize active participation in liquidity pools to boost the network’s capacity to handle high trading volumes. It also ensures that liquidity providers benefit directly from the platform’s growth.Direct Swap Capability without Bridges: One of L1X’s most groundbreaking innovations is its cross-chain technology that allows for transactions across blockchains without the need for bridges — offering real innovation in the cross-chain space. This feature addresses a common pain point in DeFi, reducing risks of delays, hacks, or technical errors and expands L1X’s market reach across multiple ecosystems.Phased Token Releases for Stability: L1X has chosen a staggered token release approach to prioritize its long-term investors. By focusing on high-value stakeholders and limiting speculative activity, the project aims to create a more stable trading environment compared to the volatility often seen on CEXs.
These features combine to create a virtuous cycle: as more transactions occur, fees increase, token scarcity grows, and value is returned to the community.
Comparing L1X to Other Crypto Projects
Layer One X isn’t the first project to consider delisting from centralized exchanges to focus on DEXs, but it is one of the few making this move proactively rather than reactively. Here are some examples from the crypto world:
Ripple (XRP): Delisted from major exchanges due to SEC lawsuits, XRP bounced back thanks to its strong community and continued development.Monero (XMR): Privacy concerns led to its delisting from some platforms, but it remained resilient, thriving on its privacy-focused mission.Waves (WAVES): After being delisted for low trading volumes, Waves worked to regain liquidity through native solutions.
These cases illustrate that while delisting is not necessarily a death sentence for crypto projects, it requires a solid strategy and strong community support to succeed.
What Could Go Right?
L1X’s decision to embrace DEXs has clear potential benefits:
Alignment with Blockchain Ideals: By moving away from CEXs, Layer One X is doubling down on decentralization, giving users more control and privacy.Controlled Liquidity Management: DEXs allow L1X to implement strategies like automated market makers, ensuring organic price growth.Community Focus: Through phased token releases and NFT rewards, L1X is prioritizing long-term investors over speculative traders.
What Could Go Wrong?
However, the shift isn’t without risks:
Liquidity Concerns: DEXs often lack the trading volumes of CEXs. L1X will need to fund liquidity pools and incentivize activity to avoid stagnation.User Adoption: Not all traders are comfortable using DEXs, which often have steeper learning curves and higher transaction fees.Price Volatility: Relisting could result in price swings, especially as the market adjusts to new trading conditions.
L1X’s Secret Weapon: Cross-Chain Innovation
Undoubtedly, one of Layer One X’s most compelling features is its X-Talk cross-chain technology that allows users to move tokens seamlessly across blockchain ecosystems, without needing to use a bridge. This technology expands L1X’s reach and usability while making it an appealing choice for developers building cross-chain applications. Combined with the project’s tokenomics and fee structures, I think X-Talk positions Layer One X as a platform with real utility — not just another speculative crypto project.
A Calculated Experiment
Ultimately, Layer One X’s delisting and relisting strategy is a bold experiment. It’s a move that prioritizes decentralization and community engagement over the instant gratification of centralized exchange listings. Success isn’t guaranteed, but the project’s innovative technology and thoughtful approach to liquidity and tokenomics give it a fighting chance.
As the crypto industry continues to evolve, Layer One X’s example will undoubtedly serve as a case study — whether as a model of success or a cautionary tale.
What do you think? Is L1X’s move a stroke of genius or a risky gamble? Let me know in the comments below!
Check out other articles written by me on Hackernoon! https://hackernoon.com/u/minad21
Layer One X’s Shift to Decentralization: A Game-Changer or Strategic Gamble? was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.