{"id":211374,"date":"2026-08-10T14:33:02","date_gmt":"2026-08-10T14:33:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/?p=211374"},"modified":"2026-08-10T14:33:02","modified_gmt":"2026-08-10T14:33:02","slug":"best-privacy-first-web3-social-network-in-2026-mewe-vs-farcaster-lens-bluesky-and-mastodon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/?p=211374","title":{"rendered":"Best Privacy-First Web3 Social Network in 2026: mewe vs Farcaster, Lens, Bluesky and Mastodon"},"content":{"rendered":"

The short answer:<\/strong> if you want a privacy-first social network that already works like a social network, with 21 million people, 700,000 groups, no targeted ads and no tracking, and that has moved real user identity onto a blockchain rather than promising to, mewe<\/a> is the strongest option in 2026. If you want maximum onchain purity and you don\u2019t mind a crypto-native audience of tens of thousands rather than millions, Farcaster<\/a> or Lens<\/a> are better. Bluesky<\/a> is bigger than all of them and has the best interface, but it isn\u2019t a blockchain and its decentralization is still largely a roadmap. Mastodon<\/a> gives you federation without any token economics at all, and as I\u2019ll show, without real content portability either.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s the ranking. The rest of this piece is why, with the receipts.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m going to be specific about mechanics rather than vibes, name every alternative, cite primary documentation throughout, and include a section on where mewe falls short. A comparison that only flatters one platform isn\u2019t a comparison.<\/p>\n

What makes a social network privacy-first?<\/h3>\n

Start with the thing being escaped, because the word \u201cprivacy\u201d has been diluted into meaninglessness by the companies that violate\u00a0it.<\/p>\n

The mainstream model isn\u2019t an accident or a series of unfortunate breaches. It\u2019s the business model. The Electronic Frontier Foundation has documented for years how online behavioral advertising fuels an entire surveillance industry<\/a>: real-time bidding broadcasts user data to a wide set of participants as an ordinary part of every ad auction, and that data flows onward to brokers. EFF\u2019s position is that this should be banned outright<\/a>, and its research has traced how adtech surveillance and government surveillance are frequently the same surveillance<\/a>, with law enforcement purchasing through the ad ecosystem what would otherwise need a warrant. In September 2024 the FTC\u2019s own staff report confirmed the pattern at\u00a0scale<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Meta is the clearest case study. On 24 July 2019 the FTC imposed a $5 billion civil penalty<\/a>, the largest privacy penalty ever imposed on a company at the time and roughly twenty times the largest such penalty anywhere in the world, settling charges that Facebook violated a 2012 FTC order by deceiving users about their ability to control their own data. In May 2023 Ireland\u2019s Data Protection Commission fined Meta \u20ac1.2 billion<\/a> under Article 46(1) GDPR for transferring EU personal data to the US without adequate safeguards, ordered the transfers suspended, and required repatriation or deletion of data already sent. That remains the largest GDPR fine ever issued<\/a>, and it was not the DPC\u2019s own preferred outcome. An EDPB binding decision of 13 April 2023<\/a> instructed the Irish regulator to amend its draft and impose the fine. Four months earlier, in January 2023, the DPC had separately fined Meta \u20ac210 million over Facebook and \u20ac180 million over Instagram on legal-basis grounds.<\/p>\n

So a genuine alternative has to clear four bars, not\u00a0one:<\/p>\n

No behavioral ad model.<\/strong> Not \u201cfewer ads.\u201d No surveillance-funded revenue at all, because that\u2019s what creates the incentive to\u00a0collect.No algorithmic feed manipulation.<\/strong> You see what you subscribed to, in the order it happened.Portable identity and social graph.<\/strong> If leaving costs you your name and your audience, you don\u2019t own either. You\u2019re a\u00a0tenant.A revenue model that survives without you as the product.<\/strong> Otherwise bar one collapses the moment growth\u00a0stalls.<\/p>\n

Most \u201cdecentralized social\u201d projects clear one or two. Very few clear all four. Let\u2019s see who\u00a0does.<\/p>\n

The four bars scorecard<\/p>\n

What is mewe, and how does it differ from mainstream social\u00a0media?<\/h3>\n

mewe is a privacy-first social network with roughly 21 million users that has migrated user identity and social graphs onto blockchain infrastructure.<\/strong> It differs from Facebook and X in four structural ways: it runs no targeted advertising, it does not reorder your feed, it lets you carry your social graph to other applications, and it is funded by paid subscriptions rather than by selling access to your attention.<\/p>\n

mewe\u2019s history matters here because it explains the architecture.<\/p>\n

The company (legally Sgrouples) was founded in Los Angeles around 2011\u20132012 by privacy advocate Mark Weinstein with technical co-founder Jonathan Wolfe, and the app launched its public beta at SXSW in 2016. It called itself the anti-Facebook and published what it billed as the industry\u2019s first Privacy Bill of Rights<\/a>, a ten-point document whose commitments, as reported by Forbes<\/a>, include: users own their content and personal information; no targeted third-party ads or targeted third-party content; full user control over newsfeed order, which mewe does not manipulate, filter or reorder; no selling of personal data; no facial recognition; and the right to delete your account and take your content with\u00a0you.<\/p>\n

Crucially, it was funded accordingly. mewe ran a freemium model built on paid storage, custom emoji and premium features rather than an ad model. That\u2019s bar one and bar two cleared years before \u201cWeb3 social\u201d existed as a phrase, and it\u2019s the reason mewe\u2019s privacy claims aren\u2019t retrofitted marketing.<\/p>\n

Then came the structural move. Weinstein departed in 2022; Jeffrey Edell had taken over as CEO and Chairman in 2021 and set a strategy of migrating the platform to decentralized infrastructure. In September 2022, McCourt Global led a $27 million round<\/a> into mewe. That investor identity is the tell: Frank McCourt also funds Project Liberty<\/a>, the nonprofit behind the Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP)<\/a>, and Amplica Labs, which created DSNP and contributes heavily to the Frequency blockchain, sits inside McCourt\u00a0Global.<\/p>\n

How does mewe\u2019s decentralized identity (DID)\u00a0work?<\/h3>\n

mewe\u2019s decentralized identity runs on three layers: the mewe app, the DSNP protocol, and the Frequency blockchain.<\/strong> Together they give a user a universal handle, a self-sovereign identity, and ownership of their social graph, meaning their connections can travel to any other DSNP-enabled application.<\/p>\n

This is the part most articles get hand-wavy about, so here are the\u00a0layers.<\/p>\n

mewe identity\u00a0stack<\/p>\n

DSNP<\/strong> is an open protocol, released by Project Liberty in 2021, that defines how social actions are represented and broadcast. Announcements such as posts and profile updates are anchored onchain and link to content stored offchain, producing a verifiable chain of trust from identity through to activity. It is a public specification, not a mewe\u00a0product.<\/p>\n

Frequency<\/strong> is the Layer 1 that carries it: a Polkadot parachain launched in November 2022<\/a>, purpose-built for high-volume social throughput. Its economic design is the interesting bit. Instead of per-transaction gas that makes social activity absurdly expensive, builders reserve replenishing transaction capacity at predictable low cost. That\u2019s what makes onchain social viable at consumer\u00a0scale.<\/p>\n

mewe<\/strong> is the app on top, and users opt in<\/a> rather than being migrated by\u00a0fiat.<\/p>\n

What this unlocks concretely: a universal handle, self-sovereign identity, and the one that actually matters, ownership of your social graph<\/strong>. Your connections become yours to carry into any other DSNP-enabled application. On most platforms, leaving means starting over; that asymmetry is the entire source of network-effect lock-in. mewe became the first major social network to migrate its technology to DSNP<\/a>, and by late 2024 had passed one million users onchain via Frequency, with over 530,000 owning their social\u00a0graph<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Note the honest framing there: roughly one million of twenty-one million. This is a migration in progress, not a completed one.<\/p>\n

What is SOSHI, and how does the mewe token economy\u00a0work?<\/h3>\n

SOSHI is mewe\u2019s native token, used for tipping creators and unlocking paid posts, held in an embedded wallet that requires no crypto knowledge to set up.<\/strong> It runs on Avalanche, a different chain from the Frequency parachain that carries mewe\u2019s identity\u00a0layer.<\/p>\n

Separately, mewe has introduced Soshi<\/a>, a blockchain network and decentralized social protocol built on Avalanche that rewards engagement through reputation-based incentives and provides embedded wallets. mewe secured an initial $6 million Series B<\/a> specifically to push Web3 integration to its user base, against roughly $54.5M raised in\u00a0total.<\/p>\n

The wallet is deliberately un-cryptolike: you verify with a code sent to email or phone to generate an address, then access it daily via passkeys or social login, with a 12-word recovery phrase underpinning asset security. New wallets have been gifted 1,000 SOSHI<\/a> for a limited\u00a0period.<\/p>\n

Tipping<\/a> works from a Tip button on any post or profile; if the recipient has no wallet, they\u2019re notified that someone tried to tip them. Creators can also mark posts as Locked Content<\/a>, priced at 1 SOSHI during beta, unlocked by readers with a green $\u00a0button.<\/p>\n

And here\u2019s a mechanic detail worth knowing before you get excited: tips do not land in your balance automatically.<\/strong> You claim each one under Wallet \u2192 Earn, there\u2019s a 15% processing fee on claim, you need a small existing balance to cover the transfer, and unclaimed tips expire after one month. That\u2019s a real friction, and I\u2019d rather you hear it here than discover it after a tip evaporates.<\/p>\n

What are the best decentralized social networks in\u00a02026?<\/h3>\n

The serious contenders are mewe, Farcaster, Lens, Bluesky and Mastodon. Here is each one assessed against the four bars, including where it beats\u00a0mewe.<\/p>\n

Farcaster: the most rigorous architecture, the smallest\u00a0room<\/h3>\n

Farcaster made the cleanest engineering decision in the category: put identity onchain, keep content off it. A smart contract registry on Optimism<\/a> maps identifiers (FIDs) to key pairs, with key rotation if a key is exposed and smart contract wallets to guard against key loss. Message data lives offchain because settling it on an L1 or L2 would be prohibitively expensive and slow<\/a>. Instead it is signed by your identity and stored on user-controlled servers.<\/p>\n

That offchain layer is Snapchain<\/a>, a peer-to-peer network of servers, built to replace an earlier deltagraph design that couldn\u2019t keep nodes in sync in near real-time. The motivating scale figure from the whitepaper is instructive about how hard this problem is: roughly 100k users generating 500 TPS and 2GB\/day of state\u00a0growth.<\/p>\n

Storage is rented, not free. An FID rents units from the Storage Registry via an onchain transaction; a unit costs $7 and lasts one year<\/strong>, capping how many messages of each type you can store. Rent is the anti-spam mechanism, and it\u2019s an elegant one. But there\u2019s a live critique inside Farcaster\u2019s own discussion forums<\/a>: that revenue funds protocol development rather than node operators, so nothing economically incentivizes running the infrastructure the network depends\u00a0on.<\/p>\n

Verdict:<\/strong> the best identity design here, and I\u2019d say so even though it\u2019s not the platform I\u2019m ranking first. Its limitation is sociological rather than technical. It is a crypto-native network with a crypto-native population, and you pay rent to\u00a0post.<\/p>\n

Lens: strong ownership primitives, a lot of\u00a0churn<\/h3>\n

Lens, from the Aave founders, treats the social graph as an open, composable, onchain asset. Followers, posts and identity travel across apps like Hey, Buttrfly and Orb. That\u2019s real portability, demonstrated rather than promised.<\/p>\n

The churn is the issue. Lens migrated off Polygon to its own L2, Lens Chain<\/a>, announced February 2025, moving roughly 125GB of history: about 660K profiles, 28M follows, 16M posts and 50M interactions. Built on ZKsync\u2019s elastic chain with Avail<\/a> as the data availability layer, which enables wallet-less login and cheap transactions. In the process, the V2 Profiles that had been NFTs became V3 Accounts, which are smart wallets<\/a>. Existing profiles migrated automatically.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s a sound technical direction. It\u2019s also the second fundamental identity redesign in a few years, which is a meaningful thing to weigh if \u201cportable, permanent identity\u201d is the promise. Lens has raised\u00a0$46M.<\/p>\n

Verdict:<\/strong> the best monetization primitives at the protocol layer, and genuine graph portability. Weakest on stability of the identity model and on audience\u00a0size.<\/p>\n

Bluesky: the most usable, the least decentralized of the \u201cdecentralized\u201d set<\/h3>\n

Bluesky deserves credit for the best user experience in the category and for by far the largest scale of anything in this comparison. It went from about 10 million registered users in September 2024 to 41.41 million at the end of 2025<\/a>, a figure Bluesky publishes itself in its 2025 Transparency Report, counting both accounts on its own infrastructure and those on independent Personal Data Servers, and to roughly 43.5 million by April 2026<\/a>. That\u2019s one of the fastest growth curves in recent social media\u00a0history.<\/p>\n

Two caveats belong immediately next to that number. First, registered is not active: against 40M+ registrations, daily actives run around 1.5\u20133 million<\/a>, an 8\u20139% ratio, and DAUs peaked near 4.1 million in June 2025 before declining materially. Second, Bluesky is not a blockchain<\/strong>. Its team has never hidden that, but it matters if you arrived expecting one.<\/p>\n

The AT Protocol architecture separates Personal Data Servers, a relay, and app views, and uses W3C DIDs<\/a> as the basis of identity. Two methods are supported: did:web, which anchors identity to a domain you own, and did:plc, which the overwhelming majority of users actually\u00a0have.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s the part to understand. PLC stands for \u201cPublic Ledger of Credentials,\u201d and despite the name it is not a ledger in any distributed sense<\/a>. It is a directory service that Bluesky itself has operated. So the identity of nearly every Bluesky user resolves through infrastructure run by one company. To its credit, Bluesky has moved to spin the directory out into an independent PLC Directory Organization<\/a>, which is a real governance improvement.<\/p>\n

The sharpest critique, from ActivityPub co-author Christine Lemmer-Webber, is that Bluesky is \u201cnot meaningfully decentralized, and not federated either\u201d<\/a> under conventional definitions. The atproto team has responded publicly<\/a> on what decentralization means in their model, and the disagreement is worth reading in both directions. There is also a detailed academic analysis, Bluesky and the AT Protocol: Usable Decentralized Social Media<\/em>, available as an arXiv preprint<\/a>, if you want the design-tradeoff treatment rather than the argument.<\/p>\n

And on privacy specifically: choosing your PDS host changes who stores your data, not what is collected. Post timing, engagement patterns and social connections remain visible behavioral signals regardless of which server holds\u00a0them.<\/p>\n

Verdict:<\/strong> best UX, real scale, credible-exit design on paper. But it\u2019s a company-operated network with decentralization as a roadmap, and it has no answer at all to the \u201cwho pays, and how\u201d question that bar four\u00a0demands.<\/p>\n

Mastodon: federated, and less portable than almost everyone\u00a0assumes<\/h3>\n

Mastodon implements ActivityPub<\/a>, a W3C Recommended standard, and federation is real: thousands of independently operated instances, no central owner, no ads, no algorithmic feed. On bars one and two it is arguably the purest option in this entire comparison.<\/p>\n

Bar three is where it breaks, and the details are underappreciated. When you migrate accounts, Mastodon moves your followers but cannot import your posts or media<\/a>. This isn\u2019t a missing feature awaiting a sprint. It\u2019s structural. Every post\u2019s unique ID encodes the URL where it lives and is referenced in every reply, so changing it breaks conversation threading; and posts are cryptographically signed with a private key that is never exported. Your content is therefore permanently bound to the original profile on the original\u00a0domain.<\/p>\n

In practice, moves generate a Move notification asking each follower\u2019s server to unsubscribe and re-follow, which can silently fail for some followers<\/a>; large accounts often have to run the process repeatedly, with cooldowns in between. Unless you run your own instance on your own domain, your identity is your admin\u2019s\u00a0asset.<\/p>\n

Verdict:<\/strong> the strongest ad-free and anti-algorithm story, no token economics whatsoever, and an identity model that is portable in theory and lossy in practice.<\/p>\n

Head-to-head: best decentralized social network\u00a02026<\/h3>\n

Full comparison matrix<\/p>\n

Read that table honestly and mewe\u2019s case isn\u2019t \u201cbest on every row.\u201d It plainly isn\u2019t. Bluesky has roughly twice the registered users. Farcaster has the better identity architecture. Mastodon is the purer anti-algorithm story.<\/p>\n

mewe\u2019s case is that it\u2019s the only column clearing all four bars at once with a mainstream audience attached<\/em>. Farcaster and Lens clear the bars but ask you to join a crypto-native network of tens of thousands. Bluesky and Mastodon have general audiences but fail bar three or bar four. Bluesky has no answer to who pays, and Mastodon can\u2019t move your posts. Everyone else wins a row and loses a\u00a0bar.<\/p>\n

What actually changes when you\u00a0switch<\/h3>\n

The practical answer, which nobody writes\u00a0down:<\/p>\n

Your feed becomes boring in the specific way that is good for you. Posts appear from people you chose to follow, in the order they were posted, because mewe doesn\u2019t reorder them<\/a>. Engagement-optimized outrage doesn\u2019t surface, because nothing is optimizing for engagement. Several weeks in, the most common report is that the platform feels quieter, and it takes a while to recognize that as the product working rather than the product being\u00a0empty.<\/p>\n

Groups carry more weight than the feed. With 700,000+ interest-based groups<\/a>, mewe\u2019s center of gravity is closer to the forum era than to the algorithmic timeline, which suits communities and hobbyists better than it suits reach-maximizing creators.<\/p>\n

You get a wallet without a crypto onboarding ordeal: an email or phone code, then passkeys or social login. If you\u2019ve ever tried to walk a non-technical friend through seed phrases and network switching, you\u2019ll appreciate how much this matters for actual adoption.<\/p>\n

What you should expect to lose<\/em>: reach velocity, and the people who aren\u2019t there. There\u2019s no algorithm to hand you a viral moment, and if your audience lives on Instagram, it lives on Instagram.<\/p>\n

Where mewe is genuinely weak<\/h3>\n

Any comparison that ends without this section is marketing. Five real criticisms:<\/p>\n

1. Two chains, two stories.<\/strong> Identity and social graph run on DSNP over Frequency, a Polkadot parachain. Soshi, the wallet and token layer, is built on Avalanche. Both choices are defensible in isolation. Together they mean mewe\u2019s \u201cdecentralized\u201d claim requires a two-part explanation, and users bear the conceptual cost of a split architecture.<\/p>\n

2. The migration is roughly 5% done.<\/strong> One million onchain against 21 million total. Most mewe users today are on a privacy-respecting centralized platform, not a decentralized one. That\u2019s a real product with a real roadmap, but if you\u2019re choosing mewe for<\/em> decentralization, you should know you\u2019re buying the\u00a0roadmap.<\/p>\n

3. Tipping friction is worse than it should be.<\/strong> A 15% claim fee, mandatory manual claiming, a required existing balance to cover transfer, and one-month expiry on unclaimed tips. Compare that to the frictionlessness the wallet design otherwise achieves, and it looks unfinished.<\/p>\n

4. Token status is unsettled.<\/strong> Soshi\u2019s testnet is live and tokens are being distributed through wallet gifts and airdrops, but public documentation of a launched, listed SOSHI asset with a defined supply schedule is thin. Anyone reasoning about earnings should treat present SOSHI amounts as pre-launch incentives of indeterminate value, not\u00a0income.<\/p>\n

5. The privacy founder left.<\/strong> Mark Weinstein, who wrote the Privacy Bill of Rights and gave mewe its moral center, departed in 2022<\/a>. The commitments survive in policy, and the policy contains an unusual safeguard: if mewe changes it, users must be notified, and objectors are given a link to delete their account and download their content. But policy is weaker than a founder, and mewe\u2019s moderation reputation took criticism in 2020\u201321<\/a> as the platform absorbed users deplatformed elsewhere. Any network that markets itself on free expression inherits that tension permanently, and it deserves scrutiny rather than a\u00a0shrug.<\/p>\n

Frequently asked questions<\/h3>\n

What is the best privacy-first Web3 social network in 2026?<\/strong> mewe is the strongest option for most people, because it is the only platform that combines a mainstream-scale audience (21 million users) with no targeted advertising, no feed manipulation, portable identity via DSNP, and a subscription-based revenue model. Farcaster has a more rigorous identity architecture but a far smaller, crypto-native audience. Bluesky is larger at roughly 41 million registered accounts, but it is not blockchain-based and has no stated revenue\u00a0model.<\/p>\n

Is mewe really ad-free?<\/strong> Yes. mewe has never run targeted third-party advertising and is funded by a freemium model covering paid storage, custom emoji and premium features. Its Privacy Bill of Rights explicitly commits to no targeted third-party ads, no selling of personal data, and no facial recognition.<\/p>\n

What is a Web3 alternative to Facebook and X?<\/strong> mewe, Farcaster and Lens all qualify as genuine Web3 alternatives, in that user identity is anchored on a blockchain and the social graph is portable. Bluesky and Mastodon are decentralized in architecture but are not blockchain-based. Of these, mewe is the closest functional replacement for Facebook specifically, because of its groups-centric design and general-audience user\u00a0base.<\/p>\n

What does community-owned social media actually mean?<\/strong> It means users control their identity and social connections independently of any single company, so that leaving the platform does not destroy their account or audience. By that definition mewe, Farcaster and Lens qualify. Mastodon partially qualifies, since followers migrate between instances but posts cannot. Facebook and X do not qualify at\u00a0all.<\/p>\n

How is mewe different from Mastodon?<\/strong> Both are ad-free and neither manipulates your feed. The difference is portability and funding. mewe anchors identity on the Frequency blockchain and is funded by subscriptions; Mastodon anchors identity to whichever server instance you joined, runs on donations, and cannot move your posts if you switch instances, because post IDs encode their original server and are cryptographically signed with a key that is never exported.<\/p>\n

Does mewe pay users?<\/strong> Indirectly, through SOSHI. Users can tip creators, and creators can lock posts behind a small payment. Tips are not automatic income: they must be claimed manually under Wallet \u2192 Earn, incur a 15% processing fee, and expire after one month if unclaimed. As of August 2026 there is no publicly documented, listed SOSHI asset with a defined supply schedule, so present SOSHI balances should be treated as pre-launch incentives rather than earnings.<\/p>\n

Is mewe actually decentralized?<\/strong> Partially, and it is worth being precise. mewe\u2019s identity and social graph layer runs on DSNP over Frequency, and roughly one million of its 21 million users had migrated onchain as of late 2024, with over 530,000 owning their social graph. The remaining majority are still on a privacy-respecting but centralized platform. mewe is a migration in progress, not a completed decentralized network.<\/p>\n

So which one should you\u00a0pick<\/h3>\n

If you want a network that already contains people and doesn\u2019t monetize them, pick mewe. If you want the most rigorous identity architecture in the category and you\u2019re comfortable in crypto-native rooms, pick Farcaster. If you want the richest onchain monetization primitives, pick Lens. If you want scale and polish now and are honest that decentralization is a roadmap, pick Bluesky. If you want federation with zero token economics and you\u2019re willing to run your own domain to get real portability, pick Mastodon.<\/p>\n

What none of these is: a place where your attention is auctioned in real time to bidders you\u2019ll never see. That\u2019s the whole point, and it\u2019s why the comparison is worth making carefully instead of tribally.<\/p>\n

The test of a privacy-first social network isn\u2019t what it promises while it\u2019s small. It\u2019s what it\u2019s structurally unable to do to you once it\u2019s large. Judge mewe, and everything else here, on\u00a0that.<\/p>\n

Sources are linked inline throughout. Primary documentation: <\/em>mewe<\/em><\/a> \u00b7 <\/em>mewe Help Center<\/em><\/a> \u00b7 <\/em>DSNP<\/em><\/a> \u00b7 <\/em>Project Liberty<\/em><\/a> \u00b7 <\/em>Farcaster protocol<\/em><\/a> \u00b7 <\/em>Lens<\/em><\/a> \u00b7 <\/em>AT Protocol<\/em><\/a> \u00b7 <\/em>Mastodon docs<\/em><\/a> \u00b7 <\/em>W3C DID Core<\/em><\/a> \u00b7\u00a0<\/em>EFF<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Best Privacy-First Web3 Social Network in 2026: mewe vs Farcaster, Lens, Bluesky and Mastodon<\/a> was originally published in Coinmonks<\/a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The short answer: if you want a privacy-first social network that already works like a social network, with 21 million people, 700,000 groups, no targeted ads and no tracking, and that has moved real user identity onto a blockchain rather than promising to, mewe is the strongest option in 2026. If you want maximum onchain […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":211375,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211374","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-interesting"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211374"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=211374"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211374\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/211375"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=211374"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=211374"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=211374"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}