
{"id":129235,"date":"2026-01-22T18:30:28","date_gmt":"2026-01-22T18:30:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/?p=129235"},"modified":"2026-01-22T18:30:28","modified_gmt":"2026-01-22T18:30:28","slug":"this-bitcoin-price-level-must-hold-or-its-mid-50000s-veteran-analyst","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/?p=129235","title":{"rendered":"This Bitcoin Price Level Must Hold Or It\u2019s Mid-$50,000s: Veteran Analyst"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bitcoin\u2019s April 2025 swing low around $73,000 has become the make-or-break line for 2026, according to veteran professional trader and commentator Nik Patel, who argues that a higher-timeframe break below that level would likely open the door to a prolonged grind in the mid-$50,000s.<\/p>\n<p>In Part Three of his \u201c2026 Outlook\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/substack.com\/inbox\/post\/185048613\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">published<\/a> Jan. 21, Patel laid out a high-conviction call that Bitcoin prints fresh all-time highs in the first half of 2026, framing it as further evidence the market has shifted away from the clean, narrative-driven four-year cycle. \u201cBitcoin trades new all-time highs in H1 \u2014 the 4-year cycle is dead,\u201d he wrote, summarizing his regime view as \u201chigher for longer,\u201d potentially stretching into 2027.<\/p>\n<h2>Why Bitcoin Must Hold $73,000 Or Risk A Slide<\/h2>\n<p>Patel\u2019s core technical claim is simple: as long as Bitcoin does not close key higher timeframes below the April 2025 low, the broader structure remains intact and the base case is continuation higher. He acknowledged that he expected a sharper reversal earlier: \u201cTiming-wise, I was wrong on my expectations for a more immediate reversal,\u201d but stressed that price has continued to hold above the April lows \u201cdespite having every reason to break and close below.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That resilience, in his view, matters more than moving averages or anchored references. \u201cSince 2022, we have not made fresh lows on a weekly timeframe below the bottoms that preceded the next highs (or, more plainly, weekly structure in the most technical sense has remained bullish with higher-highs and higher-lows),\u201d Patel wrote.<br \/>\n\u201cThis has not changed and I place less weight on MAs, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsbtc.com\/xrp-news\/vwaps-dont-lie-xrp-faces-judgment-day\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">VWAPs<\/a> etc. than I do on price itself, and whilst the $73k April lows that preceded the $126k all-time highs are protected, weekly structure is still bullish.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>His forecast leans heavily on a macro and positioning backdrop he describes as inconsistent with a deep-cycle crypto bear market. Patel cited \u201cGoldilocks into reflation,\u201d rising inflation breakevens, falling real rates, midterm dynamics, and bearish sentiment and positioning as part of the setup that makes a 2018- or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsbtc.com\/bitcoin-news\/bitcoin-bounce-bull-trap-2022-style-bear-flag\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2022-style unwind<\/a> less likely in his framework.<\/p>\n<p>Patel\u2019s downside map is unusually explicit for a discretionary macro-technical thesis. \u201cIf I\u2019m wrong \u2014 and we close the higher timeframes below $73k \u2014 we likely trade mid-$50ks this year, consolidate there for many months and produce no new highs in 2026,\u201d he wrote, outlining a scenario where a structural failure forces a wholesale reassessment.<\/p>\n<p>He reiterated that the trigger is not an intraday wick but timeframe closes. In his year-ahead playbook, he described being \u201cinvalidated on a weekly close below $73k but with a view to re-entering on an immediate reclaim,\u201d while \u201cfully\u201d cutting exposure if Bitcoin prints a monthly close below $73,000, in which case he would \u201cprepare for mid-$50ks.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Patel also pushed back on the idea that the drawdown from the highs represents a new, uniquely bearish regime. \u201cWhere many view the most recent move off the highs into $80k as a \u2018structural shift unlike prior corrections\u2019, I disagree and continue to view this as a \u2018higher for longer\u2019 regime within which we have these 30-40% corrections, range-bound price-action chewing through supply and subsequently continue higher,\u201d he wrote.<\/p>\n<p>He added that the correction \u201cfelt different\u201d in part because it coincided with what he called \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsbtc.com\/news\/bitcoin\/bitcoin-ethereum-prices-october-10\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the largest liquidation event in crypto history<\/a>,\u201d alongside forced selling dynamics and long-term holder supply, yet it has still only produced a drawdown modestly larger than prior pullbacks in the broader uptrend.<\/p>\n<p>Even so, Patel allowed for near-term turbulence. He said there is \u201ca decent chance we sweep the November low in early Q1,\u201d but maintained he \u201ccategorically\u201d does not expect a higher-timeframe close below the April lows in the first half of the year. His base case remains new highs in H1 2026\u2014\u201cperhaps in late Q1 but likely in early Q2.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>At press time, BTC traded at $90,060.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bitcoin\u2019s April 2025 swing low around $73,000 has become the make-or-break line for 2026, according to veteran professional trader and commentator Nik Patel, who argues that a higher-timeframe break below that level would likely open the door to a prolonged grind in the mid-$50,000s. In Part Three of his \u201c2026 Outlook\u201d published Jan. 21, Patel [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":129236,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-129235","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-discovery"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129235"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=129235"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129235\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/129236"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=129235"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=129235"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=129235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}