
{"id":117529,"date":"2025-12-03T11:00:44","date_gmt":"2025-12-03T11:00:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/?p=117529"},"modified":"2025-12-03T11:00:44","modified_gmt":"2025-12-03T11:00:44","slug":"bitcoin-and-the-2026-fed-shift-expert-says-markets-arent-ready","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/?p=117529","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin And The 2026 Fed Shift: Expert Says Markets Aren\u2019t Ready"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Macro strategist Alex Kr\u00fcger is tying Bitcoin\u2019s next macro chapter directly to the coming reshuffle at the Federal Reserve, warning that investors are underpricing how far US rates could fall under a Trump-aligned central bank.<\/p>\n<p>In a long X <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/krugermacro\/status\/1995874965841645887\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">post<\/a> titled \u201c2026: The Year of the Fed\u2019s Regime Change,\u201d he argues that \u201cthe Federal Reserve as we know it ends in 2026\u201d and that the most important driver of asset returns will be a new, much more dovish Fed led by Kevin Hassett. His base case is that this shift becomes a key driver for risk assets broadly and Bitcoin in particular in 2026, even if crypto markets are currently trading as if nothing fundamental has changed.<\/p>\n<h2>Why The Federal Reserve Will Dramatically Change<\/h2>\n<p>Kr\u00fcger\u2019s scenario is anchored in personnel. He notes that prediction platform Kalshi put the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsbtc.com\/news\/will-crypto-explode-kevin-hassett-fed-2026\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">odds of Hassett becoming chair<\/a> at 70% as of 2 December, and describes him as a supply-side loyalist who \u201cchampions a \u2018growth-first\u2019 philosophy, arguing that with the inflation war largely won, maintaining high real rates is an act of political obstinacy rather than economic prudence.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A few hours after Kr\u00fcger\u2019s thread, Trump himself added fuel, telling reporters at the White House that he would announce his Fed pick \u201cearly next year\u201d and explicitly teasing National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett as a possible choice, after saying the search had been narrowed down to one candidate.<\/p>\n<p>To explain how this would translate into policy, Kr\u00fcger reconstructs Hassett\u2019s stance from his own 2024 comments. On 21 November, Hassett said \u201cthe only way to explain a Fed decision not to cut in December would be due to anti-Trump partisanship.\u201d Earlier he argued, \u201cIf I\u2019m at the FOMC, I\u2019m more likely to move to cut rates, while Powell is less likely,\u201d adding, \u201cI agree with Trump that rates can be a lot lower.\u201d Across the year he endorsed expected rate cuts as merely \u201ca start,\u201d called for the Fed to \u201ckeep cutting rates aggressively,\u201d and supported \u201cmuch lower rates,\u201d leading Kr\u00fcger to place him at 2 on a 1\u201310 dove\u2013hawk scale, with 1 being the most dovish.<\/p>\n<p>Institutionally, Kr\u00fcger maps a concrete path: Hassett would first be nominated as a Fed governor to replace Stephen Miran when his short term expires in January, then elevated to chair when <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsbtc.com\/news\/crypto-trump-style-flood-of-rate-cuts\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Powell\u2019s term ends in May 2026<\/a>. Powell, he assumes, follows precedent by resigning his remaining Board seat after pre-announcing his departure, opening a slot for Kevin Warsh, whom Kr\u00fcger treats not as a rival but as a like-minded ally who has been \u201ccampaigning\u201d for a structural overhaul and arguing that an AI-driven productivity boom is inherently disinflationary. In that configuration, Hassett, Warsh, Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman form a solidly dovish core, with six other officials seen as movable votes and only two clear hawks on the committee.<\/p>\n<p>The main institutional tail risk, in Kr\u00fcger\u2019s view, is that Powell does not resign his governor seat. He warns that this would be \u201cextremely bearish,\u201d because it would prevent Warsh\u2019s appointment and leave Powell as a \u201cshadow chair,\u201d a rival focal point for FOMC loyalty outside Hassett\u2019s inner circle. He also stresses that the Fed chair has no formal tie-breaking vote; repeated 7\u20135 splits on 50-basis-point cuts would look \u201cinstitutionally corrosive,\u201d while a 6\u20136 tie or a 4\u20138 vote against cuts \u201cwould be a catastrophe,\u201d turning the publication of FOMC minutes into an even more potent market event.<\/p>\n<p>On rates, Kr\u00fcger argues that both the official dot plot and market pricing understate how far policy could be pushed lower. The September median projection of 3.4% for December 2026 is, he says, \u201ca mirage,\u201d because it includes non-voting hawks; by re-labeling dots based on public statements, he estimates the true voters\u2019 median closer to 3.1%. Substituting Hassett and Warsh for Powell and Miran, and using Miran and Waller as proxies for an aggressive-cuts stance, he finds a bimodal distribution with a dovish cluster around 2.6%, where he \u201canchors\u201d the new leadership, while noting that Miran\u2019s preferred \u201cappropriate rate\u201d of 2.0%\u20132.5% suggests an even lower bias.<\/p>\n<p>As of 2 December, Kr\u00fcger notes, futures price December 2026 fed funds at about 3.02%, implying roughly 40 basis points of additional downside if his path is realized. If Hassett\u2019s supply-side view is right and AI-driven productivity pushes inflation below consensus forecasts, Kr\u00fcger expects pressure for deeper cuts to avoid \u201cpassive tightening\u201d as real rates rise. He frames the likely outcome as a \u201creflationary steepening\u201d: front-end yields collapsing as aggressive easing is priced in, while the long end stays elevated on higher nominal growth and lingering inflation risk.<\/p>\n<h2>What This Means For Bitcoin<\/h2>\n<p>That mix, he argues, is explosive for risk assets like Bitcoin. Hassett \u201cwould crush the real discount rate,\u201d fueling a multiple-expansion \u201cmelt-up\u201d in growth equities, at the cost of a possible bond-market revolt if long yields spike in protest. A <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsbtc.com\/bitcoin-news\/1-million-bitcoin-arthur-hayes-fed-pulled-trigger\/\">politically aligned Fed<\/a> that explicitly prioritizes growth over inflation targeting is, in Kr\u00fcger\u2019s words, textbook bullish for hard assets such as gold, which he expects to outperform Treasuries as investors hedge the risk of a 1970s-style policy error.<\/p>\n<p>Bitcoin, in Kr\u00fcger\u2019s telling, should be the cleanest expression of this shift but is currently trapped in its own psychology. Since what he calls the \u201c10\/10 shock,\u201d he says Bitcoin has developed \u201ca brutal downside skew,\u201d fading macro rallies and crashing on bad news amid \u201c4-year cycle\u201d top fears and an \u201cidentity crisis.\u201d Even so, he concludes that the combination of a Hassett-led Fed and Trump\u2019s deregulation agenda would \u201coverride the dominant self-fulfilling bearish psychology, in 2026\u201d \u2014 a macro repricing he insists \u201cmarkets aren\u2019t ready\u201d for yet.<\/p>\n<p>At press time, Bitcoin traded at $92,862<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Macro strategist Alex Kr\u00fcger is tying Bitcoin\u2019s next macro chapter directly to the coming reshuffle at the Federal Reserve, warning that investors are underpricing how far US rates could fall under a Trump-aligned central bank. In a long X post titled \u201c2026: The Year of the Fed\u2019s Regime Change,\u201d he argues that \u201cthe Federal Reserve [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":117530,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-117529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-discovery"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117529"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=117529"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117529\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/117530"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=117529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=117529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mycryptomania.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=117529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}